TaubmanSucks.com
WillowBendSucks.com
WillowBendMallSucks.com
ShopsAtWillowBendSucks.com
TheShopsAtWillowBendSucks.com
GiffordKrassGrohSprinkleSucks.com

[ Home Page | Condensed Version | The Movie | The Book | News | Blogs | Feedback / Mail List ]


The Complaint

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

THE TAUBMAN COMPANY LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership,
Plaintiff,

v. WEBFEATS, a Texas company,
and HENRY MISHKOFF, an individual,
Defendants.

Case No. 01-72987
Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff
Magistrate Judge Komives


COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, The Taubman Company Limited Partnership ("Taubman"), by and through its undersigned counsel, for its complaint against Defendants WebFeats and Henry Mishkoff, states as follows:


Parties and Jurisdiction

  1. Plaintiff Taubman is a Delaware Limited Partnership with its principal place of business at 200 East Long Lake Road, Suite 300, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48303.

  2. On information and belief, Defendant WebFeats is Texas company with its principal place of business at 2661 Midway Road, #224-225, Carrollton, Texas 75006. WebFeats is an assumed name of its sole owner, Henry Mishkoff. Defendant WebFeats has engaged in actions in Michigan which confer personal jurisdiction over it.

  3. On information and belief, Defendant Henry Mishkoff is the owner and operator of Defendant WebFeats, and is in direct control of its activities. Defendant Mishkoff has engaged in actions in Michigan which confer personal jurisdiction over him.

  4. This action is brought for violation of unfair competition Section 32 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §1114 (1996), Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §1125(a) (1996), federal common law trademark infringement, and violation of the "Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act," 15 U.S.C. §1125(d) (1996).

  5. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1331 (1996) and 15 U.S.C. §1121 (1996). Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. §1391 (1996).


General Allegations

  1. Taubman owns and operates a shopping mall with the distinctive name "The Shops at Willow Bend." In connection with its shopping mall services, Taubman owns the federal trademark registration for the mark "THE SHOPS AT WILLOW BEND," (the "Mark") registered October 31, 2000, U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2,400,909. Exhibit A.

  2. Taubman has engaged in extensive marketing activities in connection, with its shopping mall under its trademark "THE SHOPS AT WILLOW BEND" and has expended significant resources to develop its goodwill in and consumer identification with the mark. As a result, the mark "THE SHOPS AT WILLOW BEND" has become an extremely valuable asset of Plaintiff.

  3. Taubman owns and uses the domain name www.theshopsatwillowbend.com, incorporating its distinctive mark, to promote its shopping mall and disseminate information regarding the mall. Plaintiff also owns the related domain name www.shopwillowbend.com.

  4. Defendants have registered and are using the domain name www.shopsatwillowbend.com, which domain name incorporates Plaintiff's registered mark in its entirety. At this site, Defendants promote Plaintiff's shopping mall and purport to disseminate factual information about Plaintiff's shopping mall. In fact, this information is incorrect. Also on this site Defendants include advertising, an indication that the website is being operated for commercial gain. Furthermore, the advertisement featured on the side promotes goods (shirts) in direct competition with goods sold at Plaintiff's mall, in an attempt to divert mall customers, with the text "You Don't Have to Go to the Mall... We'll Come to You...". Exhibit B.

  5. Taubman has priority of use and superior trademark rights in the mark "THE SHOPS AT WILLOW BEND."

  6. Defendants' use of Plaintiff's mark, in its domain name and on its website www.shopsatwillowbend.com is likely to cause confusion or mistake or deception in violation of the federal laws for trademark infringement and unfair competition.

  7. Since May 17, 2001, Taubman has notified Defendants that its mark is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and has requested that Defendants cease and desist from their acts of trademark infringement and cybersquatting, but Defendants have refused to cease and desist such acts.

  8. Defendants' unauthorized use of Plaintiff's mark is damaging the rights of Taubman in its mark, and is done deliberately in bad faith, and with full knowledge that the Plaintiff is being damaged thereby.


Count I - 15 U.S.C. Section 1114 Trademark Infringement

  1. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation in Paragraphs 1-13 above as if fully set forth herein.

  2. Defendants' activities in operating a website for commercial gain which extensively uses and promotes Plaintiff's registered trademark is creating a likelihood of confusion in violation of Section 1114 of the Lanham Act. l5 U.S.C. §114.

  3. Such infringement is causing damage to Plaintiff.

  4. Having been notified of Plaintiff's rights in the mark, Defendants' ongoing infringement is willful and deliberate.

  5. The willful infringement by Defendants will continue unless enjoined by this Court.


Count II - 15 U.S.C. Section 1125(a) Trademark Infringement/Unfair Competition

  1. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation in Paragraphs 1-18 above as if fully set forth herein.

  2. Defendants' use of Plaintiff's mark constitutes a violation of 15 U.S.C. §1125(a).

  3. The infringement by Defendants has been willful and deliberate.

  4. Defendants' willful infringement will continue unless enjoined by this Court.


Count III - Violation of 15 U.S.C. Section 1125(d)- Anti-Cybersquatting Act

  1. Plaintiff incorporates by reference each and every allegation in Paragraphs 1-22 above as if fully set forth herein.

  2. Defendants' use of the domain name www.shopsatwillowbend.com is with full knowledge of Taubman's prior rights in the mark "THE SHOPS AT WILLOW BEND" and with a bad faith intent to divert customers for commercial gain.

  3. Defendants' actions constitute a willful violation of the Anti-Cybersquatting Act, entitling Plaintiff to relief under the Act.


Request for Relief

THEREFORE, Plaintiff The Taubman Company Limited Partnership respectfully requests that this Court grant the following relief:

  1. A preliminary and permanent injunction ordering that all use by Defendants of the infringing domain name, and any other use of the Mark, cease, and restraining Defendants from infringement of Plaintiff's Mark, from injuring Plaintiff's business reputation, from unfairly competing with Plaintiff, and from engaging in unfair and deceptive trade practices;

  2. Transfer of the infringing domain name to Plaintiff;

  3. Plaintiff's damages resulting from Defendants' infringement, and an award of enhanced damages as a result of the willful nature of the infringement;

  4. Plaintiff's costs incurred in connection herewith, including its reasonable attorneys fees;

  5. Such other relief as the Court deems equitable and just.

Plaintiff demands a jury trial on all issues triable by a jury.

Respectfully submitted,

Julie A. Greenberg (P-38299)
Lisa Rycus Mikalonis (P-39485)
GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE,
ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI, P.C.
280 N. Old Woodward Ave., Suite 400
Birmingham, Michigan 48009
(248)647-6000

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Date: 8/7/01

View the Original Complaint (in a separate window)


Next: About the Complaint

[ Home Page | Condensed Version | The Movie | The Book | News | Blogs | Feedback / Mail List ]

©2001 Hank Mishkoff
All rights reserved.